And still -1 on the revised proposal for the same reasons I stated before. Cos
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:39PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > First off: Can we *please* focus on the revised proposal and not get > into a loop about the original email? I'll change the topic if that helps. > > The revised edition, as partly suggested by Sam (and echoed by Bertrand) > was: > > - Binding votes on incubation, graduation and/or retirement are only > valid when given by members of the IPMC who are independent from the > podling in question. Mentors are free to recommend such actions, but > cannot cast a vote themselves. > > I don't believe I mentioned MIA mentors anywhere - is that something you > wish to discuss as well? > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 10/11/2015 11:34 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > I’m -1 on on this. The whole premise of the ASF is that it is a > > meritocracy and that volunteers at various “levels” of the organization > > have attained their status because they are trustworthy. Without this > > premise, the ASF falls apart. > > > > Finally, it’s not clear to me that this addresses the problem of MIA > > mentors. If they were supposedly tied in some manner to the incubation and > > graduation of a podling, then they are definitely active during its > > incubation; I have no problem with that because in my book, they are > > trustworthy. > > > > I’ve made proposals to solve the problems listed below, the causes of which > > are, imo, volunteerism and a free ride into a project and its PMC. My > > proposal was after 3 missed votes, the mentor is automatically removed with > > simple no-fuss reinstatement procedures should the mentor wish to redeem > > themselves. Mentors cannot stay with the podling when it graduates. > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > >> On Oct 9, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Incubator folks, > >> > >> I would like to propose we adopt a mentor neutrality policy for > >> incubating podlings: > >> > >> - A mentor must not be financially tied to the project or its incubation > >> status. > >> - A mentor must not have a vested interest in incubating, graduating or > >> dismantling a podling that goes beyond the general Apache mission > >> - A mentor must not be affiliated with the entity granting the code > >> (company or original project community) > >> > >> Furthermore, I would like to see this extended to votes on graduating or > >> retiring podlings, so that only people with no organizational (aparty > >> from the ASF) or financial ties to the project (or the companies behind > >> it) can cast a binding vote on graduation or retirement. > >> > >> This would essentially mean: > >> > >> - If you work for a company (or are hired as consultant/advisor) that is > >> entering a project into incubation, you cannot mentor it nor vote > >> for/against its incubation, graduation or retirement. > >> - If you are a in the original community behind the project, you cannot > >> mentor it nor vote for/against it. > >> > >> I believe this would create a neutral mentorship whose sole mission is > >> to guide podlings with the interests of the ASF in mind. > >> > >> > >> Please do discuss this. If there is (mostly) positive feedback, I would > >> like to, at some point, have a vote on including this in the Incubator > >> policy. I realize this would cut down on the number of potential > >> mentors, and I would ask that more people step up to the challenge of > >> mentoring if adopted. > >> > >> With regards, > >> Daniel > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
