on 1/4/02 12:00 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) Related to POI. As long as they know the current state of Jakarta and > can make an informed decision, and meet all the criteria described in > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html, then they have my +1. > After all, what good is it to have published criteria which omits > important "details" like "Jon will block if he feels that Jakarta is > fucked up today"? ;-)
Sam...not even funny... I never gave a vote so don't put words into my mouth. > Oh, and Stefano's stewardship more than sufficiently meets that > particular criteria in my book. Yea, after I wrangled it out of him. This whole fucked mess would have been averted if Stefano had simply stepped up and said he would take stewardship. Multiple times, I said that that was needed and it *finally* got stated by him. So, shall another ballot be cast based on the latest information? -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
