> on 3/21/02 12:57 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In that case, the entire Jakarta site needs to be redesigned. > > It makes use of embedded tables and <font> elements. It does > > not use CSS at all. > > Correct.
I don't know much about anakia, but I know more about xhtml and css than I do about java (sadly so =). I'll volunteer. I will probably need help with Anakia, though. IMHO, a website should be accessible using: - pentium 200 - 800x600X16bit - IE 4+ - NS 5+ - Opera 5+ - other standards compliant (or almost) browsers like konqueror And I mean totally viewable and printable. This is possible while also being xhtml 1.0 and CSS 1 compliant. While I'm at it, will I offend anyone if I change some stuff (like the blue in the subprojects bit on the front page =)? If not, send in a few feature requests if you want to. Stressing "a few". > > We also have issues with older browsers. > > Only versions 5.5 and later will support the Print stylesheet. > > > > IE 5.5+ > > Netscape 6 > > Mozilla > > > > Anything before that, and you can't count on the stylesheet > > working. > > I'm ok with that. I'm not. There is no reason for advanced graphical stuff on a site about programming stuff. Requiring JDK1.3, megs of libraries to download, reading 6 books on programming techniques first, etc, I'm okay with that, but lets avoid browsers wars! > Netscape 6 and IE 5.5 are released versions of > the latest > technologies. If those new technologies support the features we need, then > lets require them for those features. It is like the big switch > from JDK 1.1 > to JDK 1.2. :-) IMHO, Netscape sucks on the UI part. IE doesn't run on *nix... Anyway, I'll just shut up and do it...I have no time really but I'll try and finish somewhere next week. You guys okay with that? grz, - Leo Simons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
