On Dec 28, 2003, at 3:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:I see jakarta more like a union ( EU-style ), were the different projects that joined are mature entities that choose to be part of jakarta ( and can choose to get out - all that's needed is a vote ). And the PMC role is to make sure the rules are respected
Project maturity aside, I was with you up until the last sentence.
Then you haven't seen what the EU has been up to :) Talk about over-regulation...
The PMC is supposed to be performing "the active management of one or more projects", not ensuring that other people are doing it. The PMC is not supposed to be a body of auditors. I see your analogy as describing self-managing bodies, i.e., projects with their own PMC, who operate a collective for the common good.
Because the PMC would consist of those doing the active management (i.e. the active, interested committers) , we have things covered.
geir
--- Noel
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
