Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Again, you are confusing herds and projects. > > Here's another example of it done correctly. If you add a game to the > tree, the herd should be listed as games. Period. Even if you are > going to be the sole maintainer of the package, games should be the > herd. Why? Because it is a game, silly. > > There are quite a few packages under games-* that are completely > maintained by someone not on the games team, which means it is not > maintained by the games project. That doesn't change the fact that it > is a game, and belongs in the games herd. > > Herd == grouping of packages > Project == team of people
This new terminology plain sucks. If you are sticking games into <herd> in metadata.xml, you are just confusing me and other people who are assigning bugs. You'll get mis-assigned bugs. Either don't do it or find another tag and get the DTD updated. <herd> is being used for assigning bugs, you are using it as a placeholder for something else. Category already tells us that it's a game, don't stick games into <herd> unless you actually maintain it. Thanks. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
