On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:37:27 -0700 Joe Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assuming that the file extension must change to prevent current PMs > from trying to parse new format ebuilds (and not require waiting a > year or more), I'd be a lot happier seeing it change *once* to a new > fixed extension, with the requirement that the new ebuilds are > required to contain within them them EAPI. This should future-proof > the system.
Only until another source-level change comes along, which will hopefully be fairly soon -- eclasses need a good kick in the nuts, for example, and that pretty much means a source-level break. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
