On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:16:31 +0200 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, we are aware of that bug in a feature we consider highly > > experimental. > > Hmm, I'd have guessed config files are moderately relevant.
You didn't notice the large warning telling you not to use Portage config files? > And why don't y'all fix a bug like that? We do what PMS requires regarding handling of inline comments (which is the same as what some EAPI 0 accepting Portage versions do, so PMS can't allow inline comments), and indicate an error (rather than writing junk, as older Portage did) when inline comments are used. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
