On śro, 2017-05-24 at 13:39 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/05/2017 12:24, Michał Górny wrote: > > On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > > > Next time such a thing happens, the discussion will happen on a > > > > completely private media or not happen at all because of the state > > > > of this mailing list. Is this what you really want? > > > > > > Here's the part you did not quote... > > > > > > > > If we could have a guarantee of proposed changes like that being > > > > > posted on Gentoo-User for comment, rather than being sprung on > > > > > users by surprise, I'd be willing to sign off this list. > > > > > > Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for comment...". What I'm > > > asking is for such proposed changes to be posted on Gentoo-User, and the > > > discussion/feedback/flamefests/etc will be on Gentoo-User. This type of > > > surprise stuff seems to happen a lot in Open Source... > > > > > > * Gentoo /usr > > > * Firefox Australis UI, and dropping ALSA and going PulseAudio-only > > > * GNOME getting a hard-coded dependancy on systemd > > > * etc, etc > > > > And what would be the use of those 'user comments'? Do you believe it > > would change anything? So what is the purpose of asking more users from > > feedback *we do not want*? > > > > Would it make you feel better if you were asked to raise your objection? > > Would you feel better claiming that we did it against objections of many > > users? Or do you believe we would abandon it and decide not to do > > anything because of the resulting bikeshed -- which seems to be > > a recurring theme lately? > > > > Yes, I *do not want feedback* on *how to do Gentoo* from people who do > > *not help me do Gentoo* but instead only complain and demand. > > > > > I can't let this one go. > > Michał, Walter is a long-term high-quality Gentoo-user and does not > deserve to be told what you just said above. > > Please get your act together and stop treating other people as worthless > nuisances. > > You are annoyed by someone or something, that much has been obvious for > a long time now. I can assure you, Walter is not the correct target for > your annoyance. Please deal with the correct source. >
I'm sorry, I didn't mean that to apply specifically to Walter. It was focused on the purpose of splitting the mailing lists. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
