On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 10:53:02PM -0400 or thereabouts, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > Hmm, what does scanimage -L do? I know you said but I've forgotten. If > scanimage -L doesn't find it then xsane won't either. In my case scanimage > -L found it and so did xsane. Xsane is essentially a GUI equivalent of > scanimage. > > I'd recommend going to man sane-usb and checking the man pages found in the > see also section as well as man sane. That's what I did. > > > > On Tue Jun 03, 2003 at 09:41:36PM -0400 or thereabouts, Brett I. Holcomb > wrote: > > > Did you check man sane-usb? I have a scsi scanner but had to set up some > > > config files. > > > > > > > Hello, > > Thanks for the tip. I read the man on sane-usb and made some changes, but > > no go. I'm beginning to hate xsane. sane-find-scanner finds the scanner, > > why the hell won't xsane find the scanner. These are the questions I ask > > myself and others when I am frustrated. :-)) Thanks again. > > > > Mike > > -- > > Brett I. Holcomb > AKA Grunt <>< > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > Well, scanimage -L does not find the scanner. I just don't understand this, the scanner is there in the kernel. Everything seems to be in place, but it will not find the device. I did check man sane-usb I'll recheck man sane, but I haven't a clue. Why is sane-find-scanner finding the scanner device, but xsane won't. Well, thanks for taking the time to reply. I shall forge on! :-))
Mike -- Regards, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Don't Fear The Penguin." -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
