On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 10:42:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I was already suspicious that UW-IMAP could do what I wanted it to do, and > > now I'm even more suspicious that it will at least come close. > > UW is excellent for home use, but it has scaling/performance issues for heavy > use.
I don't expect heavy use anytime in the near future. > > Since all I really want is webmail + mutt, maybe what I need is a webmail > > client that works directly with the maildirs. I wonder if such a client > > exists... > > If you've already got Courier IMAP working, why not just install > SquirrelMail and point it at your (local) IMAP server? That's exactly > what I do -- works like a champ. Simply because I'm picky and I don't like the way Courier lays out the mailboxes. I /insist/ that they be stored in a sensible way in the filesystem for mutt users, and my definition of sensible doesn't include Courier's dot-heirarchy maildirs :). I'm trying to set up something similar to a site I've used before, which used IMP, UW IMAP (I think), mutt, and mbox folders. It lets you make folders directly under ~/Mail/ with mutt, and they show up nicely in IMP webmail. The two main differences between that setup and my ideal setup is that I would like to use squirrelmail and maildirs. It basically just comes down to UW's support for maildirs at this point, I think. ta, Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
