---------- quoting Jens Mayer ---------- > * On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 20:38:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > SpamAssasin is the only non-Bayesian spam filter to consider). > > Recent versions of SpamAssassin in fact do have Bayesian filters > implemented which can be easily (auto)trained. I'm using such a > setup with SpamAssassin 2.55 at the moment and it works very > well for me.
yup! sorry for this maybe "me too!" answer, but for all of you who didn't know about how good SpamAssassin is: I use SA since ~3 months, get around 200 ham mail and around 30 spam mail / day, and only got one (1!) false positve in this 3 months. -- Mmm ... foot-long chili dog - Homer Simpson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
