On Wednesday 14 Sep 2011 11:25:23 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:10:40PM -0400, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > Is it simply subscribing to -dev and voicing the conversation there? > > > > Of course not. But please, do that if you think it will help to steer > > Gentoo to whatever direction do you think is the correct one. > > Personaly I don't think the devs (who, AFAIK, do not receive a single > > dime for working on Gentoo) will appreciate anybody telling them how > > they should do their jobs, the one they do for free. But that's just > > me. > > I think so. Most devs are grateful for (polite) feedback, and take it > into account when doing their work. I suspect they're unaware of just > how much this change to booting is disliked by Gentoo users.
Could someone please nudge them this way for them to get first hand feedback on their decision. > > No, by "you know what needs to be done" I mean: code. Contribute. > > Become a developer. Make shit happens the way you think it should > > happen. > > > > Shut up and code. Google it, I didn't come with the phrase. Not all of us have the capability to code, although all of us are grateful for good code devs produce and often express our user needs and wants in this M/L. > Just as a matter of interest, how much coding have you done for open > source or free software? It was conspicuously absent from the CV you > posted here a few days ago. Canek may wish to keep his reply off list because it wouldn't be of particular interest to many and is not relevant with Gentoo being aligned with a flawed (IMHO) design principle. Better we focus our efforts instead on influencing Gentoo devs and upstream decision making on this matter before it defaults into a design orthodoxy for Linux. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
