Am Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:30:57 -0400 schrieb Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org>:
> On 2013-08-11 1:06 PM, Marc Joliet <mar...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Yes, I agree that that might perhaps have been nice to mention it in the > > news > > item (although IMHO that's the sort of information the man pages are there > > for), but it *is* crystal clear in the docs, or do you not count the man > > pages > > to the docs? > > Ok, you're right... :) > > > AFAIK eselect profile uses the new location, but I don't remember how > > precisely > > I moved it (not that it matters). > > I just tried changing it > > eselect profile set 3 > eselect profile set 1 > > and it didn't create the link in /etc/portage, it is still in /etc... Ah, then it *preserves* the current location. I have it in /etc/portage and eselect profile kept it there, too. However, I just checked and if you delete make.profile and then re-create it with eselect profile it is created in /etc/portage. > >> Not sure why the two preceeding dots are there in the current one in > >> /etc, but they are... > > > > The current location is /etc/make.conf, right? Then ../usr/[...] will > > resolve > > to /usr/[...], whereas your ln command above will resolve to /etc/usr/[...], > > which is, erm, wrong :) . > > So, to do this manually just: > > ~ ln -s make.profile /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0 > > ~ rm /etc/make.profile > > ? I guess so. Or "rm /etc/make.profile && eselect profile set <whatever>" as described above. HTH -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
