On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:22:25 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: > Ok, I don't think I really want to deal with baselayout 2 unless i > really have to, does anyone know what version of LVM is safe to regress > to so I can get access to data again?
You shouldn't need to change LVM versions, baselayout has nothing to do
with actually accessing the LVM data, it simply uses a slightly different
method of starting LVM. I last updated LVM two months ago but no changes
were needed when switching to baselayout2 recently beyond the adding of
the lvm init script to the boot runlevel, which the ebuild took care of.
% genlop lvm2
* sys-fs/lvm2
[snip]
Thu Feb 7 19:58:40 2008 >>> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.33
Thu Feb 14 08:40:32 2008 >>> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.33-r1
% genlop baselayout
* sys-apps/baselayout
[snip]
Thu Jan 17 16:57:44 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.11.1
Mon Mar 31 09:18:36 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.12
Wed Apr 16 22:17:52 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.0
--
Neil Bothwick
Stupidity is NOT a handicap. You'll have to park elsewhere.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
