Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reality, regardless of what Debian, or the FSF, or you,
or any lawyers say, is that the licensing issue has not been
tested in court yet. Unless and until that happens, the
whole debate is pure theory. Debian is clearly not willing
to take the risk of being sued by someone for violating
their copyright. If Debian is willing to settle for a far
inferior product just to avoid that risk, that's their right
as distributors. You have made it abundantly clear that you
disagree with their position, so there is not much else to do.
This is not true!
There are license violations in other packages from Debian where
I _could_ sue Debian.
So sue them and put an end to this whole ridiculous debate.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list