Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The reality, regardless of what Debian, or the FSF, or you, or any lawyers say, is that the licensing issue has not been tested in court yet. Unless and until that happens, the whole debate is pure theory. Debian is clearly not willing to take the risk of being sued by someone for violating their copyright. If Debian is willing to settle for a far inferior product just to avoid that risk, that's their right as distributors. You have made it abundantly clear that you disagree with their position, so there is not much else to do.

This is not true!

There are license violations in other packages from Debian where I _could_ sue Debian.

So sue them and put an end to this whole ridiculous debate.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to