Ciao Robert,
please, read my comments inline below...

In addition at this link you can find:

- a document useful for creating a clustered set up on windows using
tomcat and IIS. There are a few tips and tricks there.
- an skeleton instance of Tomcat preconfigured to run on windows with
multiple instances of geoserver

Here is the link:
http://goo.gl/Hd6F5

Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
more information.
==

Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:     +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39  333 8128928

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Langford, Robert
<robert.langf...@salford.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> Jonathan & Christian – Thanks for your input.
>
>
>
> So in summary for my set up, best option is looking like:
>
>
>
> 1)      Using Tomcat (64-bit) as a servlet and using the Geoserver WAR file
>
> 2)      Use JRE (unless further monitoring needed, then use JDK)
>
> 3)      Use JRE6
>
> 4)      Run Geoserver as a “Windows service” (through/via Tomcat)

I agree with all these steps.
>
> 5)      Use 64-bit JRE so no JAI (anyone have experience on performance 
> differences?)

The difference will not be dramatic. In most cases it will be 5% to 10%.

>
> 6)      Upgrading to new point releases; as now using Tomcat, more options 
> available than via standard Windows installer

Correct. You only need to stop tomcat remove the old war and drop the new one.

Make sure to:
-1- use an external data directory
-2- back up the current data dir prior to an upgrade
-3- put data outside the data directory (backups are easier to perform).
>
>
>
> I’d appreciate it if anyone else has any further thoughts on these points.  I 
> never quite grasped the reason to use Tomcat as Geoserver works out the box 
> with Jetty; felt like it added an extra layer for little benefit, but 
> starting to see why.
>
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this communication/message from 
> robert.langf...@salford.gov.uk sent on Fri Jun 28 17:14:45 2013 is 
> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
> addressee(s) 
> geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net;jonathanmou...@warwickshire.gov.uk
>
> Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, 
> or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
> may be unlawful.
> As a public body, Salford City Council may be required to disclose this email 
> [or any response to it] under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, unless the 
> information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act.
> Please immediately contact the sender, robert.langf...@salford.gov.uk if you 
> have received this message in error.
>
> For the full disclaimer please access http://www.salford.gov.uk/e-mail.  
> Thank you.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to