Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Jody wrote: "Nice work! It is so much easier to proceed when there is > someone who "owns" the code." > > Peter sounds like he'll be able to answer questions, but I don't think > he currently has the time to actively maintain the module. Maybe that > is why work on the modile has tappered off. > > After looking at the code I think I have come up with a plan to move > forward. Peter mentioned the XML parsing code in his module is likely > outdated. I plan on replacing this with some updated code. I actually > found some code by Paul Austing that provides reads GPX files to > produce generic DataObjects, and writes DataObjects back out to GPX. > I'm hoping that I can integrate this code. > Interesting; do you know what parser Peter was using?
If you do bring Paul's code over make sure we have permission to; or publish the jar to the maven repository etc... > It would be great if we could parse all the pom.xml files and produce > a master list of dependencies by module. That might point out > opportunities for library consolidation. > I think you will find that information available in two forms already: - as "reports" published by Martin; he provided the links but you can generate them yourself using "mvn site:site" - from the command line: mvn dependency:tree ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
