On 18/05/10 16:11, Andrea Aime wrote: > Ok, this goes against the graduation rules, you don't have the necessary > testing coverage.
So, I thought, why am I waving my hands when I should be measuring the coverage? Turns out it is much better than I thought (gt-app-schema on trunk, before gt-app-schema-resolver changes). All those tests here and there have been adding up: In modules/unsupported/app-schema/app-schema (r35460): mvn -o cobertura:clean cobertura:cobertura Classes: 71 Line coverage: 65% (3122/4797) Branch coverage: 55% (1109/1989) Complexity: 2.599 My remarks still stand: GeoServer app-schema-test provides much more coverage. But GeoTools app-schema is in better shape than I thought. :-) -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
