On 18/05/2010, at 10:44 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly >> build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out >> quickly right? > Coverage being checked nightly? This is news to me. I though he indicated that more tests were being run from the geoserver nightly builds; perhaps the coverage is not measured but the code is getting tested.
>> We do not demand all the points raised be covered in order to >> graduate; but we do want to know what we are up against with respect >> to plugin documentation, test coverage, ip check etc. I think ip >> check is the only formal one that can issue a down check. > > Correct. However I believe we should resist any module graduation > that does not have enough tests unless there is good reason > for that. Sounds like it is not going to be an issue based on Ben's most recent email. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
