On 25 June 2012 18:19, dbyhundred <doverton...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Sean**** > > ** ** > > There are still plenty of things to address before the subject can be > considered "done". Follow the United Nations Group of Experts on > Geographical Names and the EuroGeoNames implementation. In > EGN<http://www.eurogeographics.org/eurogeonames>we pursued one data model > that met with European requirements under the > INSPIRE dm, but **** > > ** ** > > 1) this changed and **** > > 2) many of the feature types and values that would make the best gazetteer > are simply not captured by the main data providers. **** > > ** ** > > EuroGeographics continue this work with the Finnish Geodetic Institute. > The proposal now favoured will follow the OGC gazetteer profile (as I > understand it). >
How many of these various specs have feature types that can be identified by simple Web URL, pointing into some kind of HTML documentation? For those cases we can probably use them directly with schema.org by reference... Dan
_______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list Geowanking@geowanking.org http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
