In a message dated: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 18:07:36 PDT Ken Ambrose said:
>- the 1600sw has a funky resolution of 1600x1024 that most digital > video cards don't support, and >- even if it were supported by the hardware, XFree86 would still have > to know about it. Non-trivial.) Ahhhm, XFree86 knows about my monitor just fine. Or am I missing your point here? >It's still the nicest LCD panel I've ever seen; Ayup! Me too! It's painful to go to work in the morning, knowing I'm stuck with a sucky monitor there. Hmmm, maybe I'll make that a stipulation when the economy picks up. I want 4 weeks vacation AND an SGI 1600SW monitor :) >if there were cards that were supported by Linux that drove those new >Apple displays, I might be tempted, though. That might not be too far off. My understanding was that the company who was making those monitors was under exclusive contract to Apple for only a finite period of time, and that expired last year some time. We could start seeing them in the near future. >Well, that, and if RH has another IPO. :( I'd just settle to see their stock jump up 10 or so points :) -- Seeya, Paul ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
