> Has the Open Publication Licence been considered? Draft 0.4 is > currently up at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ > > It seems to me that the Mutopia project is about publishing free (in > the GNU GPL sense) music, and the OPL appears to be made to measure > for this kind of thing. It almost fits; it just seems that some of it is geared too specifically towards published works. <Open Publication License> Any publication in standard (paper) book form shall require the citation of the original publisher and author. The publisher and author's names shall appear on all outer surfaces of the book. On all outer surfaces of the book the original publisher's name shall be as large as the title of the work and cited as possessive with respect to the title. </Open Publication License> What if there is no original "publisher"? Matt
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Peter Chubb
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Werner LEMBERG
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues glenprideaux
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Werner LEMBERG
- RE: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Yesberg, John
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues drarn
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues drarn
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Michael Nyvang
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Christian Mondrup
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Michael Nyvang
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Michael Nyvang