[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Open Content License is not a good choice, because it does not
> (at least when last I looked) permit selling copies.

There is a different license (drafted by ao. O'Reilly), called Open
Publication License.  It is not the same as the OCL
(http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml). OPL says


       Commercial redistribution of Open Publication-licensed material
       is permitted.




-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter 
      http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html 

Reply via email to