[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The Open Content License is not a good choice, because it does not > (at least when last I looked) permit selling copies. There is a different license (drafted by ao. O'Reilly), called Open Publication License. It is not the same as the OCL (http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml). OPL says Commercial redistribution of Open Publication-licensed material is permitted. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Peter Chubb
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Peter Chubb
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Werner LEMBERG
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Richard Stallman
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues glenprideaux
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Matthew Hiller
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Werner LEMBERG
- RE: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Yesberg, John
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues drarn
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues drarn
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Chris Sawer
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Michael Nyvang
- Re: Mutopia copyright/legal issues Christian Mondrup