On Sep 3, 5:11 pm, Geostrophic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see what you mean, regarding the efficiency. Not seeing an immediate
> way around the IE efficiency problem, I'm looking into building a
> "Smarter" application - that would display the radar in a different
> way when viewed in IE.
>
> To that end, since IE acts a lot better when the radar is opaque, I
> was looking at the potion of keeping the radar images opaque in IE,
> and somehow overlaying just the roads from the G_NORMAL_MAP on top of
> the radar image. I've seen it done, here:

http://tropics.myfoxtampabay.com/index.php?siteID=1018&load=rdr

Unfortunately, it uses Flash which to some may be a deal breaker.  It
also appears to be using its own custom tile set rather than your GIF
files.

Correct scaling can really improve animation speed.  I could easily
send you width & height parameters if you could adjust the GIF file to
fit.  Otherwise, the browser must do it for every frame of every
cycle.

The natural dimensions of the GIF files are 600 x 550 pixels.  The
browser does a pretty lousy job of stretching or squeezing it to fit.
Pixel interpolation at the server will really improve the appearance.
IE7 can do it reasonable well but it adds overhead.  IE6 has a less
capable "Blur" filter which also adds overhead.  Firefox has nothing
except simulated dithering with multiple partially opaque copies of
the same file at slight offsets.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to