Fair enough. It is the case, however, that requiring that the user log in is not inherently a violation of the TOS, correct? It's only when you make that service unavailable to the general public. Free registration is still hunky-dory. In my case we allow guests to use the service as well, which doesn't even require registration, so I guess it doesn't matter, but IANAL and caution is generally in order. ;)
-G On May 27, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Rossko wrote: > >> Isn't it also valid if he can post a url where you can simply >> download >> his "app"? It sounds like he's operating more under the "application" >> clause(s) of the TOS, in which case your test more or less always >> fails... > > I did say it was A test , not THE test. Either way a public URL is > needed ... > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
