> If the former, then I understand it as mostly a mean to provide > mocks/stubs/fakes for testing. How about gwt-mockito then? > https://github.com/google/gwtmockito
This is tangenting a bit...but... :-) I know everyone uses them, but IMO mocks are less than ideal for testing UI code. With stubs, you can have state and semi-intelligent behavior without repeating every test the same "oh, right, this is how a textbox works...when call this, then return that, expect so and so", etc. That said, mocks are a personal preference, and while nifty tools like gwt-mockito exist for the current state of affairs, I don't think that means making life easier for everyone (by making the require for gwt-mockito go away) is a bad thing. - Stephen -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
