Well, I didn't say that it promises to increase unit test speeds :P, I was asking if it would. It does make sense that it would since unit tests require for hosted mode and tomcat to be launched.
-- Arthur Kalmenson On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alex Epshteyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been mulling this over the past couple of weeks, and now I want > to retract my initial objection about Jetty :) Mainly because, as > Arthur and others pointed out, it's expected to speed up unit tests > (which would be a huge win). And you don't need -noserver for most of > the unit tests you might want to run - the default settings should be > sufficient. Therefore this is one area where even the "-noserver" > crowd can benefit from a faster embedded server. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:51 PM, AB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I am using -noserver so it doesnt matter and even if I wasnt, i could >> live with either. >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
