Yay Jetty.
On Dec 5, 2:50 pm, "Arthur Kalmenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I didn't say that it promises to increase unit test speeds :P, I
> was asking if it would. It does make sense that it would since unit
> tests require for hosted mode and tomcat to be launched.
>
> --
> Arthur Kalmenson
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alex Epshteyn
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've been mulling this over the past couple of weeks, and now I want
> > to retract my initial objection about Jetty :) Mainly because, as
> > Arthur and others pointed out, it's expected to speed up unit tests
> > (which would be a huge win). And you don't need -noserver for most of
> > the unit tests you might want to run - the default settings should be
> > sufficient. Therefore this is one area where even the "-noserver"
> > crowd can benefit from a faster embedded server.
>
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:51 PM, AB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I am using -noserver so it doesnt matter and even if I wasnt, i could
> >> live with either.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
