George,
maybe it is those K&N air filters?
While I ran the K&N's during the Utah rally and had no problems at
altitude, it really didn't seem much better than stock (I have a '93
with low miles). A fellow GTS'er I met at the Utah event, tried the
K&N's on his '94 when he got back and said it ran like crap - had a flat
spot, lost 10 mph off top speed. He has ~ 50k+ miles on his engine.
'94's are supposed to run richer than '93's and with a tired engine, we
theorize that the K&N's made the bike run richer so much so that the EFI
couldn't adjust for it - it only has certain ranges within it's
preprogrammed map. That's why K&N and others are coming out with these
EFI reprogrammers.
At higher altitude, thinner air, if you're already on the rich side,
then would only get worse. Do you also have a '94 and lot of miles on
the engine?
--
Dave Biasotti // Fremont, CA
George Paramithas wrote:
>
> Yea me says altitude and GTSs don't play well together. My surging BTW has been bad
>as
> ever so I twicked the ECU pots back to 11:00 o'clock instead of y'alls recommended
>1:00,
> since that's how they came when I bought this silly bike.
>
> Still testing to see if this latest innovation improves the deal. If I have to go to
>12:00
> o'clock I will turn the damn thing into a pumpkin, get a Cinderella tag and wear a
>tutu
> when I ride it.
>
> George making serious plans
>
> ________________________________________________________
> NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
> Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
> http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
