On 6/3/06, Joseph Puthooran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > My real concern is that I am planning to implement VistA in > India. I want to be sure what would be a wise strategy in terms > of the platform. Presently my view is that for the smaller > clinics and physician practices, GT.M may be the best option > considering the absence of licensing responsibilities. But for a > larger hospital, I wonder if that will be too much of a risk and > whether Cache would be safer. I cannot afford to take the risk > of failure. But it is possible that the OpenVistA on GT.M could > prove equally robust. But why people prefer Cache is still a > mystery.
First, I would encourage you, if you are going to use GT.M in a commercial setting, to purchase a suport contract. It will keep GT.M alive, and will still be a significant cost saving for the institution that you install it for. Second, I don't understand your concerns about GT.M stability/safety. It is used by the largest bank in the world! Kevin _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
