Since we're bringing up lead walls, if people are interested in that kind of
stuff, look up TEMPEST.
----
Julian


On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Anthony Q. Martin <amar...@charter.net>wrote:

> Yes, you are relative to the lock punks.  But even regular Wifi security
> can defeat them.
>
> In the defense industry common PC components have to be locked down again
> stray RF because spies in parking lots can sniff signals...even those on
> wired keyboards.
> I used to work inside a small room with 1-foot metal walls on all sides.
>  Heck, even football coaches use this tech to keep opposing teams from sniff
> playbooks!  So, if your stuff is that important... :)
>
> Anyway, not trying to talk you into anything.  Keep doing what you're
> doing, man!  Be happy!
>
> On 5/13/2010 1:14 PM, DSinc wrote:
>
>> Anthony,
>> OK. I'll get my old RF sniffer out again next week and check my 4
>> keyboards and mice........ ;)
>>
>> What kind of shields do you mean? I don't think the punks in pocket race
>> cars w/WIFI scanners see anything but my m/b's or my microwave.
>> I could be wrong, but, I believe I am roughly RF neutral.
>> Best,
>> Duncan
>>
>>
>> On 05/13/2010 12:32, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Unless they are shielded, they still leak some RF energy, bro!
>>>
>>> On 5/13/2010 12:11 PM, DSinc wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anthony,
>>>> LOL! Yes, I live in a neighborhood of "Good Ole' Boys." And, I have
>>>> met many of them over the past 6 years. None of them work at (minimum)
>>>> Radio Shack, or, any of the 3 "computer" stores in my location. These
>>>> folk do beer, babes, V8 cars/trucks, and cable/sat TV.
>>>>
>>>> Uh, installed by a service provider? Not here brother! "Let's call
>>>> cousin Jo-Bob! He's always online playing _____________!" (fill-in!)
>>>> "PassPhrase"? I could only hope.
>>>>
>>>> The spurious RF in my neighborhood caused my router's WIFI side to
>>>> have trouble linking with a test client inside my house....15ft away
>>>> from the router. WIFI has been shut off since installation.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose that if I used a wireless keyboard/mouse, then yes. But, I
>>>> do not use wireless anything. My keyboards and mice are all remain PS/2.
>>>> Still smiling, though.
>>>> Best,
>>>> Duncan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/13/2010 10:59, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hehe...Ok, Duncan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just curious, though...what do you mean by "few too many strong
>>>>> hot-spots"? Are people in your 'hood leaving their wireless networks
>>>>> open? I can see my neighbors networks, but they all appear to be
>>>>> secure.
>>>>> I think the providers are making sure they setup the customers with
>>>>> secure networks, but it's no telling how hard the passphrase are...
>>>>>
>>>>> But I do think someone can still sniff your keystrokes...unless your
>>>>> keyboard itself is "tempest" then one can make a trip to radioshack to
>>>>> see what top secret stuff you are typing.
>>>>>
>>>>> best.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/13/2010 10:49 AM, DSinc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anthony,
>>>>>> I suppose the main fear is security. I just do not wish to become an
>>>>>> RF transmission site. Yes, I am aware that encryption tech has
>>>>>> improved over the years, but, I just do not care to share my
>>>>>> keystrokes in free space.
>>>>>> Yes, I do use a 5.8GHz telephone. But, I do not spend much time on the
>>>>>> phone. Besides, most of my phone traffic is robo-political calls and
>>>>>> saying "No" to various charities seeking contributions....... :)
>>>>>> Additionally, I noticed that when I upgraded to my current DGL-4300
>>>>>> router, and tested its' WIFI side, I found a few too many strong
>>>>>> hot-spots in my neighborhood.
>>>>>> I will watch WIFI as it improves and matures. I do believe that
>>>>>> service providers may drive me to WIFI in the future anyway (ATT is
>>>>>> already!). But, until wired LAN is restricted to only
>>>>>> commercial/industrial space, I will stay wired-only.
>>>>>> Let's just call this my "tin-hat" issue.
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Duncan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/13/2010 06:45, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why do you fear WIFI, Duncan?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/12/2010 11:14 PM, DSinc wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Greg,
>>>>>>>> TNX. I've always known you were into it all... :)
>>>>>>>> Logic for WIFI makes sense; though I still fear it.
>>>>>>>> Duncan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/12/2010 23:04, Greg Sevart wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wired for all workstations, servers, and devices/appliances (ie:
>>>>>>>>> TV,
>>>>>>>>> blu-ray
>>>>>>>>> player, Dish receivers).
>>>>>>>>> WiFi N for laptops
>>>>>>>>> WiFi G for phones/other that don't speak N
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wireless is great for any device you don't want to be tethered
>>>>>>>>> on, but
>>>>>>>>> nothing beats the performance, security, and reliability of good
>>>>>>>>> old
>>>>>>>>> fashioned twisted pair.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
>>>>>>>>>> boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DSinc
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 6:25 PM
>>>>>>>>>> To: Hardware Group
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [H] Open question?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is it fair for me to NOW believe that the majority of this LIST is
>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> actively
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> using WIFI for their internal home LANs?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No. I do not wish to start a firestorm with those that use both!
>>>>>>>>>> The basic question is about the use of WIFI....... :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> (Are there many of us old fools still using only wired CAT5/6
>>>>>>>>>> LANs?)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just wondering?
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Duncan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>>>>> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2870 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>> 05/12/10 14:26:00
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>>> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2871 - Release Date:
>>>>>> 05/13/10 02:26:00
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2871 - Release Date:
>>>> 05/13/10 02:26:00
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2871 - Release Date: 05/13/10
>> 02:26:00
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to