On 10/13/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is just one more argument for doing IPF porting in a separate > branch, > > at least since some point. > > > > I admit that maintaining quality and checking for regressions on new > > platforms is a separate big problem but I believe we could try to > avoid it > > during "incubation" of new platforms. > > > > Overall I agree we could wait with branch creation until real problems > > appear. > > > > Great
OK, we can then continue as is until the IPF port matures and is ready for running non trivial applications or performance tests. At that point we can decide whether to treat it as a primary platform, in which case, we will need to test on it before committing submissions to the main branch. Or secondary, in which case we branch it and let the IPF submitters control their own destiny. Thanks for the good comments. Rana
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
