On the 0x208 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote: > Egor Pasko wrote: > > On the 0x207 day of Apache Harmony Gregory Shimansky wrote: > >> I don't really care about wording, I just wanted to make separate list for > >> high level TODO items, like implementation of big pieces, and > >> enhancements/limitations of the current code state. So I made a new link > >> from the page which Rana used and put there my 3 items. If you think > >> appropriate, you could insert your own link there too for JIT TODO items > >> and > >> rename this whole section to drlvm and JIT (if you think JIT is not a part > >> of DRLVM) to include both. Does it sound ok to you? > > Now I see your strategy :) Sure, JIT is a part of DRLVM! > > I do not like pages with nothing except one or two links. That is why > > I would prefer to put JIT and Core VM tasks on the top page. But if > > there is something more to add to the "TODO List for DRLVM" page in > > the nearest future, I feel like moving these subtasks out of the > > FrontPage. Gregory, is it something to change in the "TODO for DRLVM" > > soon? > > I think we could give it more structure as someone earlier suggested, > TODO items, enhancements, limitations, whatever. Or we could break > TODO items down in components.
+1 to split TODO items down in components. For today my vision is: * DRLVM TODOs is broken into "Core VM TODOs" and "JIT TODOs" * JIT TODOs are broken into "For Beginners", "Front End", "Performance", etc. now implemented :) take a look > First I wanted to see just how much stuff like this we'll collect, > then decide what to do with it to make it look pretty. That's why I > don't care much about pages layout right now. Gregory, I suffer from structural laziness :) I am not happy with empty structures as they confuse readers. That is why I wanted to prepare the content first and then structurize. Happily, now it's not an issue, see below. > > BTW, I do not like the name: "DRLVM known issues and limitations (TODO > > list for DRLVM)", it stresses on limitations too much :) I feel more > > like leaving it "TODO list for DRLVM". Cosmetic change, but.. :) > > Go for it. done. Now it's "TODO List for DRLVM". "JIT dev tasks" link moved there. Limitations enlisted there too. I hope, that's OK for all of us. Thank you for suggestions! -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
