On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:21:50AM -0800, Scott Francis wrote:
> sure, you _could_ do the OS as a collection of packages ... given that
> no other UNIX-like OS historically has done that, you could also
> adhere to the principle of least surprise and keep a clear segregation
> between core OS (kernel, base tools) and aftermarket packages.

any examples of linux distributions in which segregation between "core
OS" and "aftermarket packages" is not an ephemeral illusion?

I count 29 distinct RPM packages on my fedora machine for the contents
of /bin.

$ rpm -q -l basesystem   
(contains no files)

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agr...@poofygoof.com

Reply via email to