On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Aaron J. Grier <agr...@poofygoof.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:21:50AM -0800, Scott Francis wrote: >> sure, you _could_ do the OS as a collection of packages ... given that >> no other UNIX-like OS historically has done that, you could also >> adhere to the principle of least surprise and keep a clear segregation >> between core OS (kernel, base tools) and aftermarket packages. > > any examples of linux distributions in which segregation between "core > OS" and "aftermarket packages" is not an ephemeral illusion? > > I count 29 distinct RPM packages on my fedora machine for the contents > of /bin. > > $ rpm -q -l basesystem > (contains no files)
slackware, maybe; I haven't used it in a while, but it _is_ the most BSD-like of the Linuxes. Pretty much all RH and Debian derivatives use packages to manage the base OS (which is not without its benefits, but tossing non-core apps in with e.g. /usr/lib and /sbin is a little more chaos than I'm prepared to appreciate). -- Scott Francis | darkuncle(at)darkuncle(dot)net | 0x5537F527 Less and less is done until non-action is achieved when nothing is done, nothing is left undone. -- the Tao of Sysadmin