> On a similar note, anyone who wants to help design a 3rd party (aka
> MetaMod) api for HL2 (and its mods) should join the hlds_apps mailing
> list (http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_apps), I am
> about to start a discussion about what people want (and how it will look
> in general).

Hey Alfred, you're not trying to do any kind of Titan
(http://www.unitedadmins.com/titan.php) thing are you?  I remember you
e-mailed me about this many months ago and it almost got off the ground, but
it seems like it was massively over-engineered and was like trying to kill a
fly with a cannon.  :)

I know it's probably a little late in the game, but it would be nice if some
of the plugin capability was already embedded in the engine instead of
someone trying to hack in a "man-in-the-middle" approach.

Was that what the discussion was to be about ("stuff I want Alfred to embed
in the HL2 uber engine plugin system")?  Or was this more of a "Let's get
together and implement something external to the HL2 engine that gives the
same functionality as metamod/AdminMod"?

I would vote for more of the Unix/Linux style of making a bunch of small
tools/plugins that can work together rather than having one huge monolithic
application that includes everything plus the kitchen sink (which is keeping
more along the lines of metamod, but not along the lines of AdminMOD).

Scripting plugins, in general, are going to be a hot topic for many folks
and many people will feel that you'll need support for C++, C#, Perl, PHP,
Java, ActiveX, etc.  Server Admins will also want every single feature that
every other game offers in terms of player stats out the wazoo, web based
server control, varying levels of server admin privileges, etc. (much of the
stuff that AdminMOD already has, but it would be nice if these were more
modular so that you could pick and choose the features you wanted).

This is probably getting more detailed than you wanted to get into and might
best be better answered on the hlds_apps list, but I'm not sure how many
people are actively subscribed to the list.  I don't know if you wanted to
invite folks from hlds_linux and hlds, but doing so might cause a LOT of
unnecessary noise and might detract from productive discussions.  I'm sure
it will be difficult to determine what everyone really wants without getting
everyone involved and then it will just deteriorate into a huge argument
about which features are really needed and which features are "totally
lame".

Jeffrey "botman" Broome

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders

Reply via email to