On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:52 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > For instance the security work now being done on HNCP. Does ISIS already > offer the same functionality? I can't evaluate security very well, I don't > know how many active in this working group that can. I would rather use an > already standardized mechanism for doing this.
IS-IS is a routing protocol, not a configuration protocol. Its security needs are completely orthogonal to what we are doing in homenet. HNCP can probably provide the tokens required to do IS-IS security, but IS-IS doesn't bring anything to the table as far as homenet security is concerned. This is basically a red herring: Babel as far as I know doesn't bring anything to the table either. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
