Hi, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:15:38AM +0200, Markus Stenberg wrote: > [ HNCP ] > > Right. It is essentially bit more modern take on a link state > routing protocol. So if you bring it up, I bring up the another > argument - why not route using it? Cost of doing _that_ is ~100 LoC > (+ whatever fancy thing we want to do with metrics).
This is actually something I have been wondering about. Why not use
HNCP to do all the work, when it's already nicely establishing a
communication infrastructure?
This decision happened before I joined this list...
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpjOid7fxZkH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
