Hi, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:50:05PM +0100, Pierre Pfister wrote: > Last point is that the routing protocol we will agree on will not > be the last we?ll ever come-up with. Some other will be invented. > [..] And > maybe some day we will decide to move to another routing protocol > because we made a mistake or a new better routing protocol was > designed. We need to make sure that this transition will be possible. > And I think having an independent routing protocol running today > will make this transition easier.
I disagree with the "it needs to be totally open, extendable, flexible"
line of argument.
Homenet is something that needs to be implemented by *home* CPE vendors,
and interoperate between all those implementations.
Having too much options will make it look like IPSEC. Nice standards, but
to get two different implementations interoperate, you need a diploma in
troubleshooting.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpYJ6X7ms9Fl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
