On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:55 PM, Ray Hunter <v6...@globis.net> wrote: > One hour TTL could mean 24 times the DNS traffic compared to that historic > norm. It also could mean (re)signing DNSSEC zones more than 24 times per day > as hosts move around the homenet.......
Caching is really only interesting for query clusters and frequently accessed domains. I don't think there is any reason to expect that there will be performance issues for homenet names, which I would expect would be infrequently accessed by relatively few resolvers. > You either have more name resolution traffic (every day), or you have more > temporary addresses and old prefixes hanging around for longer (during a > renumbering event, which is presumably not every day). Temporary addresses don't belong in the DNS. Stale information doesn't belong in the DNS. This seems like a no-brainer to me. _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
