>> I think you're underestimating normal people, James. > Bear with me please.
With you -- always. > It's worth noting that in the vast majority of cases like you describe, > the CE router provided by the ISP is only serviceable by the provider, or > if it *is* serviceable by the subscriber, the serviceability is > ridiculously tortuous and very limited. Uh-huh. But there's just one single uplink behind which there's a local network with multiple hosts -- unlike the one uplink-one host topology you were describing in your earlier mail. >> At least over here, there definitely is a market for non-trivial home >> networks > Indeed, and I think there is definitely a case for IETF establishing > standards for how to use Internet protocols in them, as HOMENET is > doing. What I don't think is helpful is gating our development of those > standards on the predicate that ISPs should have anything to do with > it. Agreed, as long as we don't assume normal people want one uplink per host. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
