On 10/26/2017 08:22 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>On 10/24/2017 07:00 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>>
I find the model of "there is a CPE, and behind that CPE, I connect
another router to get homenet functionality" a bit unsatisfactory.
I think there are two possible deployment models.
1. The « My Friendly ISP » model [...]
2. The « My Home, my Castle » model [...]
I agree.
Note that the « My Home, my Castle » model is more general, since it can
implement the « My Friendly ISP » model by co-locating the EHR and the
CPE. I don't think the opposite is true -- once you've leaked HNCP data
to the ISP, there's no way to unleak it.
Moreover, I don't believe there are any ISPs that are interested in the
"My Friendly ISP" model at this time. And I would further contend that
the word "friendly" is doing some rather Orwellian political work in
that construction.
Accordingly, I strongly recommend that HOMENET dispense with the "My
Friendly ISP" model with extreme prejudice, and adopt what I shall call
the "HOMENET Castle Doctrine" as a matter of working group policy.
--james
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
