Professor Pizka and others, While you continually make this point about some people are not suited for some things, I feel that you go about it in the wrong fashion. It seems that your take on the matter is that if someone tries to make it in the world of horn playing, who does not have an ideal tongue, or lips, etc. then he is out to "ruin" the profession. Is there idealism in music? Of course. Idealistically Beethoven would not have become deaf. Yet, almost every conductor still ends their tenure with an orchestra with his Ninth symphony. Audiences still love it. If a hornist with thick lips or an imperfect embouchure can play the music, no matter what Hans Pizka thinks is the definition of "music," and the audience enjoys it, they will get hired. Even if this person has to work slightly harder than the posterboy hornist, but can play, what's to stop him from trying? Biased orchestral hornists who feel that only their way is right; the same people that will only let their section play a Conn 8D, or an Alexander, or a Paxman. While there is constant dissuasion to not letting the irregulars try, there seems to be no reasoning for it. There is reasoning for why they may not make it, whether it is biases or that the person simply isn't good enough, but there is no reasoning why this person may not try. While you say that you are not trying to discriminate, in effect, you are.
Keep more of an opened mind, and maybe keep your eyes closed from that guy with the thick lips playing a Holton really well. While practice may never make him perfect, he can get just about as close as anyone else. Michael Scheimer, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2003 Interlochen Arts Camp Concert Band, 2002, 2003 PMEA Honors Band and 2003 District Orchestra Founding co-member of Fünf Brass Quintet _______________________________________________ post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] set your options at http://music.memphis.edu/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org