On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 10:29 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote: > >This is currently set up as a one to one match, but should be a one to many >I think: > >The first part could be done with (one per project): >- Many images with control points and aligned with nona >- A single equirectangular >- 6 cube faces > >And the second one could be a series of output (many per project): >- A low rez stereographic projection centered at X >- A higher rez stereographic projection centered at Y and with a smaller FOV >- A HDR equirectangular for postprocess elsewhere (with an alignment >different from the other ones)
The problem with stitching one-to-many is that you really don't want to repeat the stitch for each of your output 'views' - Not only will this take forever, but your seam lines will be in different places each time. The right way to do this is to stitch a 'base' equirectangular of the scene, then generate different projections/views from this. You can do this in Hugin, just import the equirectangular into a new project and use the various output projections, or use Tom's Panini tool which is specifically designed for extracting different views. What I'm trying to say is that the 'many' part is necessarily a post-processing step, and doesn't really benefit from being integrated into Hugin. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
