> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:hum-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, 13 December 2008 4:49 a.m.
> To: Hum Sufferers
> Subject: Re: TRACING THE HUM/Article Epoch Times(John Dawes)
>
>
> Recorded Hums use standard Hertzian equipment to capture the sound. In
> Matty's case diesel engines. The Hum as reported and talked about
> here, is not Hertzian in nature, it's something else, so it can't be
> captured using something like a tape recorder or something similar.
> ( When is someone else going to twig it? )
When are you going to twig that there is a plain old boring explanation for
it. No 'new science' required.
>It would appear that only
> biological life has the (dis)ability to pick up this phenomenon - us,
> and as has been observed the animal kingdom too. The tinnitus theory,
> so promoted here is correct for those suffering from the exceedingly
> rare low frequency tinnitus,
Well, clearly not so rare at all.
>but for the rest of those suffering from
> the globally reported environmental Hum it just comes across as
> absurdly ridiculous.
And the other theories presented here are not ridiculous ?!!!
geoff
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
