Oh yeah another clue to capturing the hum sound ( I was checking on the new ICNIRP 2009 paper just released on their web site) Under amplitude modulation and microwave auditory effect, around pages 51 and 52 they stated: a single microwave pulse can be percieved as an acoustic clicking or knocking sound and a train of microwave pulse to the head can be sensed as a buzz or audible tune with a pitch corresponding to the pulse repetition rate....The threshold pressure is mPa for perception of sound at the cochlea by humans.
On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device along the > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is very > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound > detector? Or an electrolytic process device? > I think John was on to something with what he was trying before > that had > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying > vibrational effects > that it is also emitting. > > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a good way to > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My hum has > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, physical side > > effects are like tripled. > > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any means, that > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated by > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a downplay on a > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub modulations > > > may vary , along with the level. > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've experienced. > > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered in recording > > > > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the skull. Each > > > > person has a different configuration when it comes to the size of > > > > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the neurological > > > > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of Washington. He > > > > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution (0.15 N Kc1) > > > > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of tissue. At least > > > > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the other physical > > > > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell bundles and > > > > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not originating at the > > > > outer ear. > > > > Of course we are all going to have a different perception, life is > > > > great that way.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
