Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any means, that individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated by physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a downplay on a specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted? My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub modulations may vary , along with the level. I think this approach would tally with what I've experienced.
On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote: > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered in recording > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the skull. Each > person has a different configuration when it comes to the size of > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the neurological > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of Washington. He > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution (0.15 N Kc1) > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of tissue. At least > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the other physical > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell bundles and > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not originating at the > outer ear. > Of course we are all going to have a different perception, life is > great that way. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
