Trev yes the JD hum09 is what I was making my comment about.
On Jul 4, 8:31 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Did you get the sound wav file lower down the list - JD Hum09 , Dee?
>
> On Jul 5, 12:58 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > John Ok that is what I see of my hum, a form of that vibrational
> > pattern. I can close my eyes and see that form of vibration. But it
> > has different layers, and it doesn't spin in just one direction. It
> > has the capacity to reverse direction
> > But also, when the energy is dialed up, it has multiple layers
> > spinning of this form of a vibrational energy, kind of like a
> > quadapole. Sometimes sort of like that Karate Kid movie of "Wax on
> > Wax off" of flow of direction.
> > Before I ever founds others hearing this, back in 2005 my security
> > camera would discern 2 moving circles in the middle of the frame. A
> > circle on the left turning clockwise and another circle on right side
> > turning counterclockwise.
>
> > But this vibrational energy of yours that Trev uploaded, I see that
> > vibrational
> > energy field when I close my eyelids.
>
> > So my common sense says you captured one of its layers.
>
> > On Jul 1, 1:55 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I now get the same 404 error as you did Dee- but [ earlier ] I did
> > > some light analysis on Johns data and posted the files on our files
> > > list here [ find them - Above right, & below Pages]
> > > I've now added a shortened clip of the Hum sound John picked up as
> > > well - JD Hum.wav.
> > > All these recent files are prefaced JD.
> > > I hope that's OK John?
>
> > > On Jul 1, 9:34 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > But this method you speak of sounds very plausible. Because in
> > > > essence the Hum is a form of a vibration.
>
> > > > On Jun 18, 7:41 am, John Dawes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > This experiment was purely mechanical, the recording was taken from
> > > > > the movement of a vibrating mass, there was no connection with radio
> > > > > transmissions of any kind.
>
> > > > > On Jun 18, 12:22 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > What do you attribute the approx 5KHz bandspread to?
> > > > > > It seems to have a sharp cut off indicating perhaps that this an
> > > > > > equipment limit -but this would need an analysis of the mechanics
> > > > > > involved in the measurements- whilst the source stays out of the
> > > > > > picture.
> > > > > > I suggest the LF cut off could be due to the higher amounts of
> > > > > > energy
> > > > > > increasingly needed to drive natural mechanisms at LF whereas
> > > > > > there's
> > > > > > a lot HF free energy flying about from the Sun and upper atmosphere
> > > > > > lightning activity.
> > > > > > I have to allow that cloud charges are static and unipolar until
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > discharge- but that would be mostly a stable state.
> > > > > > Your results seem to show a stable presentation though- over time
> > > > > > very
> > > > > > little deviation apart from the LF modulation @ 200ms shown on the
> > > > > > Mod
> > > > > > trace.
> > > > > > The 9 ms chopping effect looks how I imagine the switched Police
> > > > > > radio
> > > > > > channels[Tetra] would present.
> > > > > > Is that a possibility ? - though the p.r. frequency's a bit out from
> > > > > > 16 Hz.
> > > > > > It's quite possibly a secondary system running or an unpublished
> > > > > > switch of channel hopping freq would explain this.
> > > > > > I know you have stated: this energy is neither a sound wave or a
> > > > > > radio wave
> > > > > > - but the parallels are there.
> > > > > > Other [unknown] mechanisms could interface the modes of energy
> > > > > > transfer.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 18, 5:01 am, John Dawes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > As I have tried to make clear, it was not my to intension to
> > > > > > > mimic the
> > > > > > > sound we hear.
> > > > > > > The experiment is very simple, to set a small mass into vibration
> > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > the range of frequencies from about 20 to 100 cycles per second
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > observe the motion that takes place.
> > > > > > > I found that a 2 points above and below 50 cycles per second the
> > > > > > > vibrating mass exhibit’s a modulation that should not be there
> > > > > > > and the
> > > > > > > only conclusion can be that some form of energy is effecting what
> > > > > > > should be the simple harmonic motion of the vibrating mass and
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > this energy is neither a sound wave or a radio wave.
>
> > > > > > > I think it would be difficult if not impossible to determine if
> > > > > > > everybody perceives exactly the same noise, this is a very
> > > > > > > complicated
> > > > > > > subject, for some sufferers experience the effects throughout the
> > > > > > > whole of their body.
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 18, 3:00 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Something else I meant to mention in the SA file ,apart from the
> > > > > > > > repetitive freq spread (indicating either some possible
> > > > > > > > aliasing or
> > > > > > > > even artifact in the source), is that the 'cut offs' of the
> > > > > > > > fundamental are limits of what many people report as Hum.
>
> > > > > > > > Mine , at the low end of 27 Hz, and upper- at 80 Hz, as the
> > > > > > > > usual max
> > > > > > > > of others where it tangles (intermodulates?) with mains supply
> > > > > > > > freq.
> > > > > > > > causing the annoying beat 'throb', that wears so.
> > > > > > > > This is shown as the wide yellow band at the base of the the
> > > > > > > > spectrum.
>
> > > > > > > > Yes!, wideband, repetitive and suspiciously clean- all in all,
> > > > > > > > coupled
> > > > > > > > with the unique measurement technique makes this more than a
> > > > > > > > chance
> > > > > > > > occurence.
>
> > > > > > > > What are your thoughts John?
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 11:39 pm, Pete <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I've got my computer output wired up to a NAD amplifier with
> > > > > > > > > some good
> > > > > > > > > bass responsive Acoustic Research loudspeakers out putting
> > > > > > > > > the sound.
> > > > > > > > > So, if the volume is turned right down until I just about
> > > > > > > > > hear this
> > > > > > > > > MP3, and the imagine it's in my head rather than coming from
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > speakers, then it's pretty damn close. If it went up and down
> > > > > > > > > randomly
> > > > > > > > > as it does, or as it does as I perceive it, then it'd be spot
> > > > > > > > > on.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
