Does it also mess with your sense of smell and taste?
On Jul 20, 1:03 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know about infrasound generators, but it does feel like it has
> an infrasound effect. Considering that the microwaves are entering
> our skulls by way of any cranial opening, and making their way to our
> cochleas, yeah I'd call that infrasonic. The hum has gotten really
> aggravating here, it vibrates and innerviates my facial nerve from the
> right side of my head where I hear it at, then pins and needles all
> the way over to the right side of my face. I guess I have a little
> hope the prime minister said we may not have enough electricity to run
> all the new telecommunications technology.
>
> On Jul 19, 3:23 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Perhaps it's intertwined with some form of a sonic device along the
> > likes of akin to infrasound generators. Vibrational sound is very
> > hard to pin down. Maybe we need something like an infrasound
> > detector? Or an electrolytic process device?
> > I think John was on to something with what he was trying before
> > that had
> > to do with trying to capture/record it with it's underlying
> > vibrational effects
> > that it is also emitting.
>
> > On Jul 16, 10:18 am, patty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Yep, That's why it hasn't been pinned down yet. Sure is a good way to
> > > keep us busy though, why we hopfully go quietly crazy. My hum has
> > > progressively changed, the new 4G is a real nuisance, physical side
> > > effects are like tripled.
>
> > > On Jul 15, 3:09 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Do you mean that with a constant hum excitation ,of any means, that
> > > > individuals will always hear a 'personal tone' , designated by
> > > > physical characteristics of the hearer, and this is a downplay on a
> > > > specific 'common' hum type ever being highlighted?
> > > > My hum is always the same tone , but the period and sub modulations
> > > > may vary , along with the level.
> > > > I think this approach would tally with what I've experienced.
>
> > > > On Jul 15, 7:47 pm, patty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Just wondering whether these factors have been considered in recording
> > > > > the hum. Because the microwaves are entering thru the skull. Each
> > > > > person has a different configuration when it comes to the size of
> > > > > their head. I also just read Henry Lai's research on the neurological
> > > > > effects of nonioninzing radiation, University of Washington. He
> > > > > stated that they used a hydrophone immersed in a solution (0.15 N Kc1)
> > > > > having an electrical conductivity similar to that of tissue. At least
> > > > > this criteria has to be meet. Not to mention all the other physical
> > > > > differences, cochlear amplification, density of hair cell bundles and
> > > > > the reaction time to shear force of stimulation not originating at the
> > > > > outer ear.
> > > > > Of course we are all going to have a different perception, life is
> > > > > great that way.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum
Sufferers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
