Dee, I appreciate your strength of conviction , but I'm not wrong. You take me too literally. Communication can take many forms, but it still needs a 'common language'. Let's say a sender and receiver then.OK? My gut feeling about malign control is all it can be -a sense of how it fits into the current diaspora.[Nice word]. If you know more , then you must increase your ability to transmit this info/perspective across and catch the interest of many disinterested people-most of whom can't even be bothered to vote, remember, let alone worry too much about their fellow citizens, or a common future overmuch! Sad to say- but this is also a current 'truth' - and it measures against small bands of dissidents or sufferers that comprise opposition to the status quo.
I agree that infra sound technology misused is highly malign, but I do have a hope , apart from 'cock-up' pulling it down, after so many years of mis-application, that there is a higher balance in the universe that has given strengths to those who oppose evil. This would be also endemic in our genetic makeup and Yes!, may even result in Hum sensitivity. The 'language' for such topic discourse is also very difficult to access, but I hope you get my drift. On Jul 22, 7:05 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > Trev Your wrong. Language does not rely on both a speaker and a > hearer. Language can be written like a deaf person reads sign > language. Our brains understand pictures as well as math. Language/ > grammer is becoming known as an innate (inbred) behavior in our DNA > and not a learned behavior. This noise we hear could very well be > speaking > to our brains subliminal, in this reality that we all are living. I > don't think it would take > as much TO FORCE A MALIGN INFLUENCE. That's why they call it > subliminal perhaps. > > On Jul 21, 2:23 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Language relies on both speaker and hearer believing in the same > > reality. > > This is how conjurors work their magic by taking control of the > > interaction - but there is NO dialogue as such.. > > Suspended disbelief and it is not far from fuzzy logic imo. > > Fuzzy logic is needed where the constaints are too far out of kilter > > with known ideas but some really new concepts are needed. > > I think that, Dee is where your vision operates and why I persist to > > struggle with what you see. > > I know what it's like when I've seen something others don't- the > > dialogue is non existent ,in truth, and a lonely path it can be too. > > As already said, I was technically 'trained' but no educated enough to > > really put my ideas into an acceptable framework. When I came to work > > in research finally, with multiple PhDs, I found them great > > intellectually, but most of their eyes glazed when moving away from a > > comfort zone of pre- assuptions and formal report writing concepts. > > The only true free mind was a guy writing a book on quantum physics > > which updated Einstein- and though he sent me a copy years later, I > > could barely scrape through the first chapter- the rest was, and still > > is, gobbledegook as we say here! > > Crop circles fall somewhere in between these margins, the possible > > genuine ones, at least promising new fuzzy logic ideas which ,by their > > nature, will seem odd or meaningless to everyday rules > > The false flag stuff [spoofed CCs] comes under conjuring tricks where > > the controllers [conjurors] have the upper hand and the fear of the > > new stops people taught only one 'official' language of what is > > permissible from stepping outside the box. This generates fear and > > confusion instead of insight, as intended. > > This is where CCs and Hum live alongside each other- but in order to > > communicate, you must find a common language or face a lone path. > > > My initial answer to your view on 'Alice CC' is that it is fair > > comment that 3D is even more impressive than 2D- but what we need is a > > handle on 4D, which is what you're probably thinking about, when > > looking into your outer reality. > > Time flows, but only by reference to the 3D world of seeing and energy > > constructs we accept. > > To dis-integrate this reality would indeed take plenty of fuzzy logic > > party tricks by God [should you believe, otherwise- cosmic truth] and > > a few others beside , I reckon ! > > > My broad view is that it would take too much to support a malign > > influence theory and 'cock up' would be order of the day. > > 9/11 aftermath does show that we can't be complacent though, about > > what is going on under our very noses! > > > On Jul 19, 11:21 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > A language within a lang? A source code? Their are c's, a plus symbol > > > that looks like it's in parenthesis.Plus symbol inside circle, maybe a > > > new metacharacter? Again I am just a layperson, but I do get around > > > research wise. The lang: operator, which restricts by programming > > > language (e.g., lang:"c++", -lang:java, or lang:^(c|c#|c\+\+)$) > > > >http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/faq_codesearch.html > > > What kind of code are you crawling? > > > > 2. What regexp syntax does Code Search support? > > > > Google Code Search supports POSIX extended regular expression syntax, > > > excluding backreferences, collating elements, and collation classes. > > > To search for a space character, escape it with a backslash, as in > > > hello,\ world. You can search for literal strings by enclosing the > > > strings in quotation marks, as in "hello, world". > > > > We also support the following Perl extensions > > > > \d Matches a digit character. > > > \D Matches a non-digit character > > > \s Matches a whitespace character > > > \S Matches a non-whitespace character > > > \w Matches a word character. (alphanumeric plus "_") > > > \W Matches a non-word character > > > > I noticed a number of D or d type characters in the crop circle, as > > > well as > > > s or S 's embedded in the parenthesis of some form. The diagonal > > > lines of hash > > > mark lines in the parenthesis, a form of W's ? > > > > Or the plus symbol is a metacharacter asterisk form? > > > each of the operators can be used as a negative by placing a minus > > > sign ("-") in front of it. > > > > :-: make the dots bigger and there could be a minus symbol inbetween. > > > > It wasn't my intention to jump this far outside the box, but the > > > crop circle image > > > brought a number of meanings to mind. I see other notation type > > > symbols > > > within it as well. I also see some form of a question mark in the > > > other side > > > of the parenthesis. > > > > :-: Symbols can be broadened like BOLD then tilted like Italics > > > and then > > > they can press it all together and re etch it into different > > > morphs of > > > different seemingly random broad/thin shapes within shapes. > > > > Most probably not what your eyes see, but that is what my eyes see > > > within that crop circle. Different multi tech levels of machine code > > > meanings. > > > > I see a language within a language of some form. > > > > I realize this meaning of mine is probably far reaching for you and > > > probably too far outside of the box, within your concepts of putting > > > forth theorys that if the technology is not proven or taught in any > > > schools that we, as a group, > > > shouldn't think too much about those type of musing of theory's. > > > By now, I would imagine, they have gotten pretty advanced on their > > > so called String Theory's? But you won't find those answers being > > > taught anywhere > > > probably either. > > > > And this noise we hear, that seems to be some form of a > > > synchronization > > > as it swings it's way around the world, well it didn't get here on > > > it's own. And it's > > > traveling through different layers of matter. Some days I muse, it > > > almost seems > > > like a perputual machine of sorts or possibly a perputual virtual > > > machine perhaps > > > that links us into this noise we hear. Perhaps a machine that has the > > > capacity > > > to learn. And like any good multi tech technology, someone has to > > > program the machine. And as the machine gets more advanced, the > > > machine code used to program the upgrade probably gets more advanced > > > too. A hierachy within a hierachy. > > > > Yes/No True/False 0 1 Black/White of inbetween of fuzzy sets of > > > Gray, > > > and the new metric logic gate of Go/No Go. Hidden within the > > > layered data is unlabeled data. All piled together but able to be set > > > apart or intertwined. > > > I muse that probably the same applies to sound transferred into data > > > bytes > > > and data bytes transferred into the seemingly random noise we hear of > > > sound > > > layers. > > > > But you asked and so I answered. > > > > Sorry so long. > > > > On Jul 16, 12:10 pm, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Re : Circle @ West Kennet Long Barrow-28/06/07 (Wiltshire) > > > > > I hadn't previously seen this shot. What is the meaning of this one, > > > > to you- Dee? it's quite old now. > > > > I was at a circle this year in the same spot ! Got rather wet from > > > > the crop. > > > > >http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2009/westkennettlongbarrow/westken...quoted > > > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
